|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Brief research summary We study the mechanisms by which human DNA tumor viruses deregulate cell cycle and apoptosis (programmed cell death) control in the development of cancer and during productive viral infection. Understanding pathways that control cell proliferation and cell death will lead to better treatments for cancer and viral infections.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and grants from the National Institutes of Health provided support for these projects. Regulation of Apoptosis by Viral Oncogenes Primary epithelial cells become transformed as a result of the combined action of deregulation of cell cycle control and inhibition of programmed cell death (apoptosis). Expression of the human adenovirus (Ad2/5) E1A oncogene releases normal restrictions on cell cycle progression through interactions with the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein and its relatives, and with the p300 and CBP transcriptional co-activators. The cellular response to this deregulation of cell growth control by E1A is the stabilization of the p53 tumor suppressor protein and the induction of p53-dependent apoptosis of transformed cells, and p53-independent apoptosis in virus infected cells. The activation of this apoptotic program prevents transformation and can diminish virus replication. The adenovirus E1B oncogene encodes an apoptosis inhibitor, E1B 19K, that is required to inhibit apoptosis, which thereby sustains transformation and productive infection. E1B 19K is a viral homologue of cellular BCL-2, and its expression blocks apoptosis induced by E1A and death receptor signaling during infection, and by p53 during transformation. E1B 19K functions as a general apoptosis inhibitor by binding to and inhibiting pro-apoptotic BCL-2 family members BAX and BAK that propagate cell death signaling through mitochondria. The long-term focus of the White laboratory has been to determine the mechanism by which E1A and E1B 19K regulate apoptosis, and the role of apoptosis in infection and oncogenic transformation. As deregulation of apoptosis is a common feature of many disease states, knowledge gained by this pursuit should provide new opportunities for the development of novel therapies, particularly for cancer treatment. E1A Sensitizes Cells to TNF-alpha by Down-Regulating c-FLIP-Short
Mechanism of Inhibition of TNF-alpha-Mediated Apoptosis by E1B 19K
BAX and BAK Function to Limit Adenovirus Replication Through Apoptosis Induction
BAX and BAK Mediate p53-Independent Suppression of Tumorigenesis
In oncogenic transformation of primary epithelial cells, E1A expression causes accumulation of p53 that
implements cell death by apoptosis as a means to inhibit transformation. E1A expression in p53 deficient
cells relieves this p53-dependent apoptosis, producing transformed cells with high frequency. While
transformed and immortal, these cells retain their p53-independent apoptotic response and are not
tumorigenic. BAX and BAK are essential regulators of pro-apoptotic signaling and the disruption of
apoptosis is linked to the development of cancer. To investigate the role of BAX and BAK in tumorigenesis,
primary BMKs from wild-type, BAX or BAK, or BAK and BAK deficient mice were transformed by expression of
adenovirus E1A and inactivation of p53. DNA damage response and MCL-1 destruction initiate apoptosis in adenovirus-infected cells Expression of adenovirus E1A deregulates cell proliferation to facilitate viral DNA replication, prompting the initiation of apoptosis signaled primarily through proapoptotic BAK in productively infected cells. We discovered that in uninfected cells, BAK is complexed with the anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family member Myeloid Cell Leukemia 1 (MCL-1). E1A expression during infection resulted in the specific down-regulation of MCL-1 through destabilization of the protein and loss of the mRNA. Upon loss of the MCL-1-BAK complex, BAK complexed with either BAX in proapoptotic E1B mutant adenovirus-infected cells, or with the adenovirus BCL-2 homolog E1B 19K in cells infected with the wild-type virus in which apoptosis is inhibited. Loss of MCL-1 was required to initiate the apoptotic pathway in infected cells as restoration of MCL-1 expression rescued infected cells from E1A-induced apoptosis. Analogous to E1A expression, DNA damage down-regulates MCL-1, and adenovirus infection resulted in the accumulation of phosphorylated H2AX and ataxia-telangiectasia mutant protein (ATM), hallmarks of DNA double-strand breaks. Thus, MCL-1 may function by maintaining BAK in an inactive state, and the loss of MCL-1 upon activation of the DNA damage response, perhaps through replication stress induced in virus infected cells, may be required to initiate the apoptotic response. This activation of a DNA damage response by an oncogene that results in down-regulation of anti-apoptotic MCL-1 may convey sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs. Hypoxia and Defective Apoptosis Drive Genetic Instability and Tumorigenesis See feature article by Louisa Flintof on this work in the October 2004 issue of Nature Reviews Cancer. Genomic instability is a hallmark of cancer development and progression, and characterizing the stresses that create and the mechanisms by which cells respond to genomic perturbations is essential. We discovered that antiapoptotic BCL-2 family proteins promote tumor formation of transformed baby mouse kidney (BMK) epithelial cells by antagonizing BAX- and BAK-dependent apoptosis. Cell death in vivo correlated with hypoxia and induction of PUMA (p53 up-regulated modulator of apoptosis). Strikingly, carcinomas formed by transformed BMK cells in which apoptosis was blocked by aberrant BCL-2 family protein function displayed prevalent, highly polyploid, tumor giant cells. Examination of the transformed BMK cells in vivo revealed aberrant metaphases and ploidy changes in tumors as early as 9 days after implantation, which progressed in magnitude during the tumorigenic process. An in vitro ischemia system mimicked the tumor microenvironment, and gain of BCL-2 or loss of BAX and BAK was sufficient to confer resistance to apoptosis and to allow for accumulation of polyploid cells in vitro. These data suggest that in vivo, even in cells in which p53 function is compromised, apoptosis is an essential response to hypoxia and ischemia in the tumor microenvironment and that abrogation of this response allows the survival of cells with abnormal genomes and promotes tumorigenesis.Deleted in Breast Cancer 1 (DBC 1) was initially cloned from a homozygously deleted region in breast and other cancers on human chromosome 8p21, although no function is known for the protein product it encodes. We identified the generation of amino terminally truncated versions of DBC 1 during Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) a mediated apoptosis. Full-length 150 kDa DBC 1 underwent caspase dependent processing during TNF a mediated death signaling, to produce p120 DBC 1 and p66 DBC 1 carboxy terminal fragments. Endogenous DBC 1 localized to the nucleus in healthy cells, but localized to the cytoplasm during TNF a mediated apoptosis, consistent with the loss of the amino terminus containing the nuclear localization signal. Overexpression of an amino terminal truncated DBC 1, resembling p120 DBC 1, caused mitochondrial clustering, mitochondrial matrix condensation, and sensitized cells to TNF a mediated apoptosis. The carboxy terminal coiled-coil domain of DBC 1 was responsible for the cytoplas mic and mitochondrial localization, and for the death promoting activity of DBC 1. Thus, caspase dependent proc essing of DBC 1 may act as a feed-forward mechanism to promote apoptosis and possibly also tumor suppression. D BC 1, like its homolog Cell cycle and Apoptosis Regulatory Protein 1 (CARP 1), may function in the regulation of apoptosis. Key Roles of BIM-driven Apoptosis in Epithelial Tumors and Rational Chemotherapy Defective apoptosis not only promotes tumorigenesis, but also can confound chemotherapeutic response. We discovered that the proapoptotic BH3-only protein BIM is a tumor suppressor in epithelial solid tumors and is also a determinant in paclitaxel sensitivity in vivo. Furthermore, the H-ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway conferred resistance to paclitaxel that is dependent on functional inactivation of BIM. Whereas paclitaxel induces BIM accumulation and BIM-dependent apoptosis in vitro and in tumors in vivo, the H-ras/MAPK pathway suppresses this BIM induction by phosphorylating BIM and targeting BIM for degradation in proteasomes. The proteasome inhibitor Velcade (P-341, Bortezomib) restores BIM induction, abrogates H-ras-dependent protection against paclitaxel, and promotes BIM-dependent tumor regression, suggesting the potential benefits of combinatorial chemotherapy of Velcade and paclitaxel. Tumorigenesis results in the acquisition of mutations that promote tumor growth and chemoresistance, and relating tumor genotype to prognostic indications and to effective treatment regimens is essential for successful therapeutic outcome. Determining the mechanism of apoptosis induction by the chemotherapeutic drug paclitaxel revealed that BIM suppresses tumorigenesis and is required for paclitaxel responsiveness. The targeting of BIM for degradation in proteasomes by the H-ras/MAPK pathway is the molecular basis for paclitaxel resistance in tumors with activating mutations in RAS, and paclitaxel responsiveness is restored by joint administration of the proteasome inhibitor Velcade. Thus rational combinatorial chemotherapy using proteasome inhibitors to enhance chemosensitivity to paclitaxel in tumors where the H-ras/MAPK pathway is activated may be therapeutically beneficial. Autophagy Promotes Tumor Cell Survival and Restricts Necrosis, Inflammation, and Tumorigenesis Defective apoptosis renders immortalized epithelial cells highly tumorigenic, but how this is impacted by other common tumor mutations is not known. In apoptosis-deficient cells, inhibition of autophagy by AKT activation or by allelic disruption of beclin1, confers sensitivity to metabolic stress by inhibiting an autophagy-dependent survival pathway. While autophagy acts to buffer metabolic stress, the combined impairment of apoptosis and autophagy promotes necrotic cell death in vitro and in vivo. Thus inhibiting autophagy under conditions of nutrient limitation can restore cell death to apoptosis-refractory tumors, but this necrosis is associated with inflammation and accelerated tumor growth. Thus, autophagy may function in tumor suppression by mitigating metabolic stress, and in concert with apoptosis, by preventing death by necrosis. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|